Loaded, Leading
Gordon Smith and the Klamath Fish Kill
The Smearing of Betsy Johnson


Mesothelioma


Learn more about mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.

NiewertAward NiewertAward


Poll
Should the Lieberman Health Care Bill Be Killed?
Yes
No
Wait and See
Not Sure

Results

LoadedO Blogger Archives
Loaded Orygun

Click here to find our archives from February 2006 through July 14, 2007

Search




Advanced Search


Send email to LoadedO!
Follow LoadedO on Twitter!
Find your favorite Trail Blazers memorabilia including jerseys and apparel

Fish, Facts and Gordon Smith

by: Steve Novick

Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 10:02:27 AM PDT


(How can I not promote this? Here we have a candidate for office talking straight, talking forcefully, and speaking the truth on a subject that has become sine qua non at LO. Can't you just hear this kind of non-parsed language from the floor of the US Senate? Take it to Gordo, Steve! - promoted by torridjoe)

Gordon Smith's recent remarks on the Klamath fish kill underscore a persistent theme. Gordon Smith doesn't take facts seriously. He doesn't take science seriously. And ultimately, he doesn't take his job seriously.

Smith said that the fish kill occurred 18 months after the water diversion - when it was actually only six months later. He said there was no evidence that the water diversion caused the fish kill - ignoring the study by the California Department of Fish and Game.

Steve Novick :: Fish, Facts and Gordon Smith
But this is nothing new for Gordon Smith. This is the same fellow who was writing in late 2003 that scientists are evenly divided on whether burning fossil fuels causes global warming. This is the same fellow who said that under George W. Bush, real wages have risen for "the first time since Ronald Reagan" -- somehow overlooking several years of the Clinton Administration. This is the same fellow who said that his own, special, massive tax cut for multinational corporations would create hundreds of thousands of jobs -- and has since failed to own up to the fact that in reality, the drug companies, such as Pfizer, who were major beneficiaries of his bill, have laid off thousands of people.

If Gordon Smith simply said, "In a contest between farmers and fish, I want farmers to win," you could almost respect the guy. But he won't say that. Instead, he will ignore science, reinvent history, believe whatever he has to believe to escape the implications of his policies.

That's not acceptable. Oregonians might re-elect an intellectually honest, well-informed, genuine conservative. But I don't think we'll re-elect someone who doesn't bother to learn simple facts that a United States Senator worthy of the title really ought to know. I don't think we'll re-elect someone who makes false pronouncements on issues of fact without, apparently, having made any effort to check the facts first. I don't think that that we'll re-elect a Senator who, like George W. Bush himself, consistently puts ideology and politics before science and responsible government.

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

But it isn't.... (0.00 / 0)
If Gordon Smith simply said, "In a contest between farmers and fish, I want farmers to win,

And that is precisely the problem The way Smith and the GOP frame the issue as it being between farmers and fish. This isn't about fish, it is about hard-working families and communities which rely on the fish-runs for their livelihood and survival. The framing that it is about people versus fish  is actually a false chose created out of a political desire to castigate conservationists as whacky fringe and divide the electorate and peal off voters who by all rational thought should be staunch democratic voters.

This is about micro-targeting and separating voting segments, and casting issues as a choice between people and tree-hugging, and the injection of FUD and searing of inconvenient facts as "junk science" The interest of Gordon Smith are about gutting the Endangered Species Act because it puts the brakes on rampant exploitation of resources because of the long-term impact of such actions. The fish-kill is but a symptom and the sort of outcome that is gained by buying into the false choices presented by ideological hacks like Smith.

Smith conveniently ignores the decimation of fishing communities which rely on stable and health fisheries. INstead of adopting plans which would avoid these sorts of crisis, by relying on the science and not seeking to distort the science for political reasons, Smith created the problems he now has the chutzpah to claim as being their to help fisherman. It is analogous to claiming credit for helping someone eliminate litter-box odor by running over their cat.

Question is, will coastal communities, anglers, sportsman, the tribes, wake up and see what Smith does and how he operates for what it is? Will commercial fishing advocates like Glenn Spain, and costal communities connect the dots and hold Smith to account at the ballot box?

I hope as a candidate to replace Smith, you bring the fight to him in costal communities on this issue.

cheers,

Mitch Gore


bringing the fight coast to... border... (0.00 / 0)
i'm pretty sure that the plan is to "bring the fight" to Smith all across the state.

i don't think Steve plans on ignoring, or giving short shrift to any part of the state.  this is going to be a campaign that's going to take place in every county and congressional district in Oregon.

there's no intention of ignoring any of the rural or coastal areas, and i think the contested primary is a great way to highlight the ways Gordon Smith has failed ALL Oregonians, not just the typical "Portland Liberal-types" that may immediately come to mind.


[ Parent ]
Never siad he was going to ignore the coast (0.00 / 0)
That is not the central point of what I am talking about (i.e. the first 3 paragraphs of my comment).

I am talking about recasting the frame of the debate on the issues. And while I don't think Steve will ignore parts of the state, I hope to see what I am referring to (the pushing the issues back into their proper context, in this case, coastal jobs vs. farmer bamboozlement for short-term electoral gain)

cheers,

Mitch Gore


[ Parent ]

Return to LO home...!


RSS Feed: http://www.loadedorygun.net/rss/rss2.xml
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Change.org|Start Petition

Put your message up top!


Blog ads are good karma...

Thanks for Saving Soapblox! (and by extension, LO!)


Loaded Links
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

Powered by: SoapBlox