Loaded, Leading
Gordon Smith and the Klamath Fish Kill
The Smearing of Betsy Johnson

Poll
Should the Lieberman Health Care Bill Be Killed?
Yes
No
Wait and See
Not Sure

Results

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

NiewertAward NiewertAward


OR Texts From Last Night
LoadedO Blogger Archives
Loaded Orygun

Click here to find our archives from February 2006 through July 14, 2007

Search




Advanced Search



Mesothelioma


Learn more about mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related diseases.

Find your favorite Trail Blazers memorabilia including jerseys and apparel
Send email to LoadedO!
Follow LoadedO on Twitter!

DSCC Poll--Gordon Smith Tanking

by: torridjoe

Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:26:39 PM PDT


(D'oh--I'll get this front paging thing right sooner or later.... - promoted by torridjoe)

tipped by BlueO and sourced by StopGordonSmith.com, the word is out today on a poll done in June by Grove Insight for the DSCC...and the news for Gordon Smith is flatly terrible...

{look out below!}

torridjoe :: DSCC Poll--Gordon Smith Tanking
Smith’s approval rating has dropped precipitously since the beginning of the year, with only 37% of likely Oregon voters now approving of his job performance and 54% disapproving.

In another sign of trouble for the Republican Senator, only 34% of voters say they will vote to re-elect him and 45% say they will consider voting or will vote to replace him with someone else.

“Oregonians have been paying close attention to Gordon Smith’s election year makeover and they’re just not buying it,” DSCC spokesman Matthew Miller said. “Gordon Smith has proven he knows how to read a poll, but Oregonians want a Senator who will stand up for them all the time, and not just when campaign season rolls around.”

Smith’s job approval rating has dropped 9 points since earlier this year – in a poll taken for the DSCC in February and previously released, 46% Oregonians approved of Smith’s job performance, with 43% disapproving. Both polls were taken by Grove Insight. The latest poll of 500 likely voters was taken from May 31 to June 3 and has a margin of error of 4.4%.

As I mentioned at the Smith site, these numbers don't quite match up with the latest from SurveyUSA, showing a far greater drop since February when the two pollsters were in general congruence. But with a second outlet to get numbers from (and even given the partisan intent of those who commissioned it), it's hard not to conclude that Smith's appeal is definitely on the decline, and his attempt to appear to be against the war is seemingly not working--and may even be having the opposite effect, as voters begin to wonder if they're being played.

There's a possibility Smith might gain some traction if he validates his cosponsorship of the Reed/Levin withdrawal amendment to be debated today (and tonight, and tomorrow) with a Yes vote. It would be his first real vote for a binding timetable of withdrawal, and would--if I'm honest--make it more difficult going forward to paint Smith as a continuing enabler of the war. Of course, the damage has been done, and Smith has spent quite a bit of time dithering and equivocating while more men and women fell in combat. And that's certainly not the only reason Smith is vulnerable; read the rest of the StopSmith site and find out more. 

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

BS (0.00 / 0)
make it more difficult going forward to paint Smith as a continuing enabler of the war.

Wrong-o.  Don't fall for the Smith bamboozle.

The guy will only votes for "end the war" measures when they have no chance of passing.  He's kicking sand in your face...


so you say (0.00 / 0)
I didn't say it makes him less of an enabler, I said it makes it more difficult to paint him that way. Once you get into "well, he only voted that way because it was safe," you have left the realm of the verifiable.

And this is indeed a threshhold vote for Smith; none of the other votes without timelines were going to pass either, but this one actually has smallish teeth.


[ Parent ]
Is there no way to hold him against the wall? (0.00 / 0)
Perhaps a "sense of the Senate" measure that excoriates his colleagues for filibustering votes on Iraq, where he would have to come down against it?

Or the "nuclear" option (of eliminating the filibuster), although I'm not a fan of this one.

Something to keep him from getting away with meaningless window-dressing votes.


Quick! (0.00 / 0)
Quick! Someone dig up Harry Lonsdale! With numbers like this, even he could win!

I hope Merkley steps up...hate to lose him in the statehouse, tho.

Samuel John Klein samuel.klein@gmail.com http://zehnkatzen.blogspot.com


Return to LO home...!


RSS Feed: http://www.loadedorygun.net/rss/rss2.xml
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



Put your message up top!


Blog ads are good karma...

Thanks for Saving Soapblox! (and by extension, LO!)


Loaded Links
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless

Powered by: SoapBlox